Hey, Ruby builders!
Debugging is a vital talent in software program growth, and on this publish, we’ll be taking a look at find out how to examine the habits of Ruby code. Because the RubyMine workforce, we’ve amassed appreciable experience in creating instruments for Ruby builders, and we’re excited to share our expertise and information with you.
Just lately, on the EuRuKo 2024 convention, our workforce member Dmitry Pogrebnoy introduced the Demystifying Debuggers discuss. This weblog publish is the primary in a sequence based mostly on that presentation, aiming to offer you precious insights into debugging Ruby purposes.
Each Ruby programmer inevitably encounters conditions the place their code doesn’t behave as anticipated. In these moments, all of us want we had an environment friendly technique to pinpoint the issue and repair it shortly. That’s the place debugging instruments come into play.
On this publish, we’ll discover varied instruments and approaches accessible to Ruby builders for investigating bugs. We’ll cowl a number of courses of instruments, every with its personal strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the specifics of every instrument will show you how to select the best one in your explicit debugging state of affairs.
To make our dialogue extra concrete, we’ll begin with a real-world instance of a bug we encountered in one in all our inside Ruby tasks. This case examine will illustrate the significance of correct debugging strategies and set the stage for our exploration of debugging instruments.
Whether or not you’re a seasoned Ruby developer or simply beginning out, this information will show you how to sharpen your debugging expertise and sort out bugs extra effectively. Let’s get began!
An actual bug case from the RubyMine workforce
Within the RubyMine workforce, our growth efforts prolong past the IDE itself. We’ve created a number of proprietary gems that improve the IDE’s performance. To share some insights, we’ll discover a real-world bug we encountered in one in all these gems a few 12 months in the past. We’ve remoted and simplified the code pattern to concentrate on the core subject.
Take into account the next Ruby code:
def course of(factor) if outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine places "Factor is Printable" else places "Factor is Not Printable" finish finish course of(5) # -> Factor is Printable course of(BasicObject.new) # -> Factor is Printable
At first look, this course of technique appears easy. It goals to test whether or not the given argument has both a to_s or an examine technique. If both technique exists, course of ought to print “Factor is Printable”; in any other case, it prints “Factor is Not Printable”.
On the backside, you may see two calls of this technique with their outputs. The primary name course of(5) produces the message “Factor is Printable”. That is right. However the second name course of(BasicObject.new) appears suspicious. It takes BasicObject as an argument, however prints “Factor is Printable”. That is incorrect as a result of the BasicObject occasion doesn’t reply to both of the strategies we’re on the lookout for. So apparently this code incorporates a bug.
Let’s take a second to look at the course of technique. Can you see the bug?
Spoiler – click on to increase!
The bug lies within the if situation:
outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine
Because of Ruby’s operator priority, the interpreter truly evaluates this as:
outlined?(factor.to_s || outlined?(factor.examine))
This expression all the time returns “expression”, no matter whether or not factor responds to to_s or examine. Consequently, the situation is all the time true, and our technique incorrectly classifies each object as printable.
The repair is straightforward however illustrative of how small syntax errors can result in vital logical flaws. We have to explicitly construction our circumstances utilizing parentheses:
def course of(factor) if outlined?(factor.to_s) || outlined?(factor.examine) places "Factor is Printable" else places "Factor is Not Printable" finish finish course of(5) # -> Factor is Printable course of(BasicObject.new) # -> Factor is Not Printable
With this correction, our technique now precisely distinguishes between objects that implement to_s or examine and people who don’t.
By sharing this real-world instance, we hope to exhibit that debugging is a vital talent for all builders, no matter expertise degree. It’s not nearly fixing errors; it’s about understanding the intricacies of the language and writing extra dependable code.
In additional complicated, production-level purposes, such points may be far tougher to establish and resolve. This underscores the significance of sturdy debugging instruments and strategies, which we’ll discover within the following sections.
Choosing the proper instrument
In the case of debugging Ruby code, builders have a number of instruments and approaches at their disposal. Let’s discover these choices, beginning with the fundamentals after which transferring on to extra superior strategies.
places statements
Essentially the most primary debugging method, requiring no setup or further gems, is utilizing places statements. This technique entails inserting print statements straight into your code to output variable values or execution stream info. Whereas easy, it may be surprisingly efficient for fast investigations.
Let’s apply this system to our earlier instance:
def course of(factor)
places "outlined? factor.to_s: #{outlined? factor.to_s}"
places "outlined? factor.examine: #{outlined? factor.examine}"
places "outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine: # outlined? factor.examine
"
if outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine
places "Factor is Printable"
else
places "Factor is Not Printable"
finish
finish
course of(5)
course of(BasicObject.new)
This yields the next output:
outlined? factor.to_s: technique outlined? factor.examine: technique outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine: expression Factor is Printable outlined? factor.to_s: outlined? factor.examine: outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine: expression Factor is Printable
The inconsistent output from these two strategies calls with completely different arguments hints at the place the issue may lie. We are able to see that, for BasicObject.new, each factor.to_s and factor.examine are undefined, but the situation nonetheless evaluates to true.
Whereas primary places statements are helpful, a number of gems could make them extra informative:
1. puts_debuggerer gem enhances places output with the file identify, line quantity, and content material of this line.
For instance:
require 'puts_debuggerer'
pd "outlined? factor.to_s: #{outlined? factor.to_s}"
Output:
[PD] example_puts_debuggerer.rb:5 in Object.course of
> pd "outlined? factor.to_s: #{outlined? factor.to_s}"
=> "Debug print 1: technique"
2. awesome_print and comparable gems present extra structured and readable output, particularly helpful for complicated objects.
Typically places statements are helpful and may successfully show you how to with easy instances or when different instruments don’t work for some motive. Nevertheless, places statements are actually primary. They require modifying your supply code each time it’s good to regulate an present message or add a brand new one. They’re often not handy to make use of as a result of it’s good to restart this system everytime you modify what you might be printing.
Execs and cons of debugging utilizing places
Execs:
- Easy and fast to implement.
- Works in any Ruby setting.
- No further instruments or setup are required.
Cons:
- Requires modifying supply code.
- Can litter the code if overused.
- Forces you to restart this system if you wish to change what you print.
- Restricted info in comparison with extra superior instruments.
Whereas places statements are invaluable for fast checks, they grow to be much less environment friendly for complicated situations or when frequent modifications are wanted. In such instances, extra superior instruments like interactive consoles or full-fledged debuggers supply larger flexibility and energy.
Interactive consoles
Interactive consoles signify the subsequent degree in bug investigation instruments for Ruby builders. The 2 main choices are IRB and Pry, each providing highly effective introspection capabilities.
To make the most of interactive consoles for debugging, you usually must insert binding.irb or binding.pry calls into your supply code. When the binding command is executed, an interactive console launches, offering entry to the present context and the flexibility to execute arbitrary expressions on this context.
Let’s use IRB in our earlier instance:
def course of(factor) binding.irb if outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine places "Factor is Printable" else places "Factor is Not Printable" finish finish course of(5) # -> Factor is Printable course of(BasicObject.new) # -> Factor is Printable
When the code hits the binding.irb line, we’ll enter an interactive session:
From: 5_example_define_irb.rb @ line 2 :
1: def course of(factor)
=> 2: binding.irb
3: if outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine
4: places "Factor is Printable"
5: else
6: places "Factor is Not Printable"
7: finish
irb(most important):001> outlined? factor.to_s
=> nil
irb(most important):002> outlined? factor.examine
=> nil
irb(most important):003> outlined? factor.to_s || outlined? factor.examine
=> "expression"
irb(most important):004> exit
Factor is Printable
This interplay permits us to look at the habits of the situation’s particular person components, serving to to pinpoint the problem.
Execs and cons of debugging utilizing interactive consoles
Execs:
- Extra complicated and versatile than
placesstatements. - Partially permits for on-the-fly investigation.
- No must predetermine all debugging output.
Cons:
- Nonetheless requires supply code modification.
- Requires you to set predefined introspection factors that can not be modified at runtime.
- Forces you to restart this system if you wish to change introspection factors.
Whereas interactive consoles supply extra energy than easy places statements, they nonetheless have limitations. For complicated debugging situations or when fine-grained management over execution is required, full-featured debuggers present much more capabilities.
Debuggers
Debuggers signify the top of instruments accessible for investigating bugs in Ruby code. They provide capabilities far past easy places statements and interactive consoles, offering full management over program execution. This highly effective characteristic set permits builders to:
- Pause execution at a specified level utilizing breakpoints.
- Examine and modify variables in actual time.
- Study the decision stack at each breakpoint.
- Step by means of code line by line.
- Consider expressions within the present context.
Let’s discover the three most important debuggers for Ruby:
1. byebug gem
- Default debugger for Ruby 2.5.X, Ruby 2.6.X, Rails 5, and Rails 6.
- Comes with all of the important options you’d anticipate from a debugger like breakpoints, stepping, context, and stack introspection.
- For Rails purposes, it requires modification of the appliance supply code. You often want to put a particular name in your code to begin the debugger at a sure place.
- Has noticeable efficiency overheads that make it much less usable for classy purposes.
2. debug gem
- Helps solely Ruby variations ranging from 2.7.
- Has no seen efficiency overheads on supported Ruby variations.
- For Rails purposes,
debug, just likebyebug, requires modification of the appliance supply code. - Bundled with Ruby ranging from model 3.1.
- Helps Ruby variations 2.3 and later – so nearly all attainable variations of Ruby your software may use.
- Has no seen efficiency overheads on any of the supported variations of Ruby.
- No want to switch the code to make use of the debugger.
- Supplies a user-friendly UI out of the field that streamlines debugging.
Regardless of its intensive characteristic set, debuggers is likely to be troublesome to make use of in some particular configurations. Whereas debuggers are highly effective, they’re simplest when mixed with different debugging strategies. The selection of debugger typically relies on your particular venture and configuration necessities, Ruby model, and private preferences.
Conclusion
Debugging in Ruby is each an artwork and a science, presenting challenges that may be overcome with the precise instruments. As we’ve explored on this publish, Ruby builders have a wealthy toolkit at their disposal, starting from easy places statements to classy debuggers.
Every debugging method we’ve mentioned has its strengths:
placesstatements supply fast, easy insights, excellent for easy points or when different instruments are unavailable.- Interactive consoles like IRB and Pry present a extra dynamic setting, permitting for deep context introspection and sophisticated expression analysis.
- Full-fledged debuggers, such because the
byebuganddebuggems, in addition to the RubyMine debugger, supply complete management over program execution, enabling builders to dissect even essentially the most intricate bugs.
The journey from encountering an surprising bug to pinpointing its actual trigger typically requires a mixture of those instruments, together with methodical investigation and generally a little bit of inventive problem-solving. By understanding the strengths and limitations of every debugging instrument, you may choose essentially the most acceptable method for every distinctive scenario.
Because the RubyMine workforce, we’re significantly excited about how our debugging instruments serve the Ruby neighborhood. We encourage you to discover the RubyMine debugger and share your experiences within the feedback beneath or create a problem within the subject tracker. Your fellow builders will certainly recognize your perception.
Trying forward, our subsequent publish will delve deeper into the internal workings of debuggers. We’ll discover their inside mechanisms and even sort out an thrilling problem: making a primary debugger from scratch. This exploration will improve your understanding of debugging instruments and supply deeper insights into Ruby’s internals.
In the meantime, reap the benefits of the superior debugger in RubyMine. Obtain the newest RubyMine model from our web site or by way of the free Toolbox App.
Keep in mind, efficient debugging is extra than simply discovering and fixing errors – it’s about understanding your code at a basic degree. Every debugging session is a chance to be taught, enhance, and write extra sturdy Ruby code.
Keep curious, preserve exploring, and pleased debugging!
The RubyMine workforce
Subscribe to RubyMine Weblog updates
