WCAG success standards that may’t be autmatically examined

There are numerous accessibility audit instruments on the market. Essentially the most mainstream one might be Chrome’s Lighthouse Accessibility audit. However let me let you know a secret.

Accessibility testing is not completed after attaining a inexperienced Lighthouse rating.

Here is Steve Faulkner itemizing WCAG success standards that are not lined by right now’s instruments.

Some apparent examples:

Automated instruments can detect lacking alt attributes however can’t decide if various textual content is significant.

Instruments can verify for semantic HTML components (e.g., headings, lists, tables) however can’t decide if relationships are precisely conveyed.

Instruments can analyze DOM order, however handbook overview is required to confirm if studying order is sensible.

Instruments can confirm the presence and construction of the title component, however can’t decide whether or not the title textual content is significant or descriptive.

Instruments can detect hyperlink textual content, however handbook testing is required to confirm if the hyperlink textual content is sensible in context.

Instruments are nice for “apparent” technical accessibility however for all the things else handbook testing continues to be required.